Wednesday, November 2, 2011

08 Alcohol: the good, the bad and the ugly

I heard a phrase a few months ago: "It's not the alcohol that makes you fat, it's the food you eat after that does."
                                                 http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-human-inventions-of-all-time.php

Many young people, especially girls, are the ones more likely to believe this. Many people opt to starve themselves during the day to allow a big alcohol binge later that night to avoid excess calorie consumption. I have already written an article entitled "Saving calories - why this doesn't work" and now again, will be illustrating why modifying your diet to allow for big party nights isn't going to work. The bottom line is, alcohol contains calories, and a lot of them. 1g of carbohydrate or protein contains 4 calories, 1 gram of fat contains 9 calories, 1g of alcohol contains 7 calories. Besides this fact, many alcoholic drinks are laden with sugar, which can rake up over 200 calories per drink. 
In fact, new research from the UK Department of Health has shown the average wine drinker consumes an extra 2000 calories a month from alcohol alone which amounts to eating an extra 184 packets of crisps a year, or 12 whole days of normal eating per year. No wonder drinkers are piling on the weight. For men, the average beer drinker drinking just 5 beers a week, adds a shocking 22100 calories a year or 110 doughnuts a year to their nutrition food profile. 
.
Despite all the calories consumed from alcohol, alcohol is directly linked to malnutrition. Although it can provide a substantial portion of our daily calorie requirements, it provides no nutrients, carbohydrates, proteins, fats, vitamins or minerals, but instead provides inflammation of several organs including the stomach, liver and pancreas while impairing our body's ability to absorb and digest proper food required to nourish it.
Doing exercise may prevent the damage we can see (weight gain), however exercise does not prevent the damage that we cannot see (liver damage, inflammation, toxic metabolite accumulation).

We all know the feelings associated with alcohol - our number 1 social mood enhancing drug and drink of choice. We know the up's and down's with a hangover often being a reminder of a good night before but an unpleasant suffering the next. We know on the basic level how it affects us, some worse than others, but do we really know what is happening inside our body? 

Alcohol, blatantly put, is a toxic chemical that produces serious pathophysiological changes in the body that can lead to death overnight, or over a period of several years.
So what exactly happens when we drink alcohol?

Alcohol, known chemically as ethanol, is rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. Because the body cannot store alcohol, it must process it, and get rid of it. This occurs by a series of detoxification reactions and follows the following metabolic pathway:

The liver is responsible for these oxidative reactions. The first step in alcohol metabolism is its conversion to acetaldehyde by the enzyme alcoholic dehydrogenase (ADH). In order to do this, we require nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) which during this reaction is converted to its reduced form NADH. This is where the toxicity really begins. Starting with:

Acetaldehyde toxicity

Acetaldehyde is approximately 30 times more toxic than ethanol itself and is the major cause of alcohol-associated side effects. Acetaldehyde is normally converted to acetic acid (what we commonly call "vinegar") in another reaction as follows:

Acetaldehyde is converted by acetaldehyde dehydrogenase to acetic acid, again using NAD+ converting it to NADH. If there is an error in this conversion, severe toxicity can result from acetaldehyde accumulation. Some people have genetic mutations and weaknesses in these enzymes preventing their efficient detoxification mechanisms. This is especially common in Asians and American Indians, but is not very common in Caucasian subjects. People who do suffer from genetic mutations in these enzymes often have extreme nausea, vomitting and headaches associated with drinking alcohol as the body cannot detoxify the metabolites. This is one of the reasons some people can have 1 drink and suffer the effects as if they had drank 10 drinks. People who binge drink and consume a large amount of alcohol in a short space of time, whether or not they have genetic mutations, can cause a build up of acetaldehyde as AcDH is not able to cope with the high demand.

Acetaldehyde accumulation results in cross-linking reactions, where it can covalently bind to protein molecules forming protein adducts. Because enzymes are proteins, acetaldehyde can disrupt metabolism and other reactions in the body by disrupting enzyme function. Acetaldehyde has also been found to disrupt formation of microtubules in the liver, resulting in fibrosis. A good example for this is given by Steven Fowkes (http://www.ceri.com/alcohol.htm) who uses the example of cross-linking in leather tanning processes. Cross-linking agents are used to link flexible collagen proteins in the animal skin to produce a tough resistant type leather. In case you didn't know, acetaldehyde is used as a cross-linking agent in the manufacture of plastic.
This is why acetaldehyde from chronic alcohol intake causes cross-linking reactions in the human skin that cause it to age and become tough, inflexible and wrinkled. This is the reason why alcoholics have some of the toughest aged looking skin around. Cross-linking.

Even if acetaldehyde is metabolised, it gets converted to acetic acid which is broken down to acetyl CoA which can enter the TCA cycle to generate energy. In high concentrations, however, acetyl CoA is also the first molecule required in the metabolism of fat generating pathways. This is why in high amounts, alcohol is actually metabolised to fat, if all the energy generated cannot be used.

Elevated NADH

One of the reasons highly athletic people battle with alcohol even in small amounts is the fact that alcohol metabolism generates a lot of NADH. The problem here is that NADH is then used in reactions to convert pyruvate (an energy intermediate) into lactic acid by the following reaction:
This ends up causing lacticacidosis and build up of lactic acid in the muscles causes severe cramping and generally poor training capacity. Excess NADH fuels metabolism toward generation of lactic acid, and not the reverse. The reverse reaction to generate pyruvate could allow for the production of glucose by gluconeogenesis reactions. This is why alcohol consumption causes low blood sugar levels as no glucose can be synthesised in the body to counteract low blood sugar.

To combat this, the body draws on its glycogen stores to supply glucose to raise blood sugar levels. This is the the other major reason why athletes really feel the consequences the next day because athletes rely heavily on glycogen stores in the muscle tissue to provide power and energy. In this way, alcohol actually breaks down these precious glycogen stores by forcing the liver and muscle tissue to convert glycogen back into glucose, leaving the muscles feeling lethargic and fatigued and causing a serious impact on training ability.

As mentioned above, alcohol metabolism increases NADH, which in turn, increases the NADH/NAD ratio. As NADH accumulates, it slows down other enzyme activity of the TCA cycle, namely isocitrate dehydrogenase. This causes an accumulation of citrate and acetyl CoA, which is the first molecule required for fat synthesis. The high NADH/NAD ratio therefore directs metabolism away from energy production and rather fat generating pathways. These fats accumulate primarily in the organs involved in alcohol metabolism, which is why alcoholics often are found to suffer from fatty liver disease, fatty myocardium and fatty renal tubules. (S Gropper et al., Advanced Nutrition and Human Metabolism, 2009).

This fat may not always be visible to the eye, but under the microscope, the damage to our bodies is clearcut:

This slide shows what a normal section of liver tissue looks like under the microscope.

Heavy drinking causes alterations in metabolism leading to fat accumulation in the liver and looks like this:

Notice the fat as large white circular globules that accumulate in the liver tissue. This causes immense stress on the liver and eventually these liver cells start to die and are replaced by fibrous scar tissue. This starts the development of cirrhosis.

Cirrhosis is often a late complication of chronic alcohol consumption. Cirrhosis, in a nutshell, is the accumulation of extensive fibrous tissue in the liver as a result of inflammation caused by alcohol intake. Unfortunately, cirrhosis is not reversible and the prognosis for survival is poor. Directly quoted from my medical biochemistry textbook "The risk for cirrhosis in alcoholics increases dramatically in males who consume 80g/day and females who consume 20g/day for 10 years." Note that 80g is equivalent to 8 beers/glasses of wine a day, which means for females in particular, consuming only 2 glasses of wine a day for 10 years significantly increases your risk, because females have a smaller body size and in fact, fewer alcohol metabolizing enzymes in the system.


Induced Metabolic Tolerance
There is another way that alcohol can be metabolised in the body. This pathway is known as the microsomal ethanol oxidizing system (MEOs) which utilizes Cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP2E1 for the metabolism of alcohol. The enzymes in this system though, are what we call "inducible enzymes". These enzymes are inducible by ethanol, meaning that when ethanol is consumed in high concentrations, it can actually induce the synthesis of these same enzymes that degrade ethanol. Sounds complicated?
Basically what this means is that the more you drink, the more these enzymes are activated to produce more to deal with the heavy load, but in doing so, establish a state of metabolic tolerance. This is why the more you drink, the harder it becomes over time, to achieve the same drunk feeling and more alcohol is required to get drunk. However, the dangers here include the fact that when enzyme induction occurs, substances that are also metabolised by the same microsomal system also generate metabolic tolerance. This ultimately means besides becoming tolerant to alcohol, you will become tolerant to other substances metabolized in a similar manner too. These generally include medication, such as painkillers and anti-depressants which are often themselves toxic to the liver and kidneys and fuel addiction to these compounds.

Its not all bad news though!
Many studies have shown that in moderation, alcohol may have beneficial effects, particularly in the prevention of cardiovascular (heart) disease. Alcohol increases good (HDL) cholesterol which protects the arteries from hardening (atherosclerosis).

There are supplements one can take to lessen the effects of alcohol:

To help detox the liver and prevent hangovers:
Milk thistle
Vitamin B1
Vitamin C

The major detoxification reactions for dealing with acetaldehyde involve sulphur-containing antioxidants such as cysteine and glutathione as well as N-acetylcysteine (NAC). All of these can be purchased from local health stores. How these work is they contain sulfhydral groups in the molecule which bind to acetaldehyde to prevent it cross-linking. A typical dose is 200mg cysteine before and after consumption of alcohol with at least 500mg vitamin C (aim for 1000mg). 

Other ways to prevent hangovers and low blood sugar, make sure you eat before you drink. Alternate your drinks with water and avoid drinking in rounds or you will likely end up drinking more than you initially anticipated. 
Here is a very useful alcohol advice page including information on calories in drinks and units of alcohol:
www.drinkaware.co.uk

Enjoy in moderation, and drink responsibly. If you reached the end of this article I hope you learnt something new and something that opened your eyes. 

Cheers!

Find me on Facebook on Nutrition through Science or Fitnessfacts100.

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

07 Condiments as calorie contributors

A condiment is usually a sauce or seasoning that is added to a meal to provide a particular taste or enhance its flavour. 



Condiments are a serious cash generator, with over $5 billion in sales last year, proving our massive consumption of them. Mayonnaise tops the condiment sales, with over $1.26 billion US dollars in mayonnaise sales being reported in 2010 in the USA alone. With sales soaring, and the number of overweight cases similarly soaring, it is definitely worth an inside look to what we are putting in our mouths - a splash here and spoonful there may be doing more damage than you realise! 


According to a market research group in the USA, SymphonyIRI group, the top selling condiments include:
                                                        Mayonnaise
                                                            Salsa
                                                  Ketchup (tomato sauce)
                                                          Mustard
                                                 French Salad dressing


To investigate further, I analysed a set of commonly used condiments per tablespoon and this was the result:



I then allocated a points system to create a ranking for the best options. I based this points system on number of calories per tablespoon, grams of fat, grams of saturated fat, mg of sodium and g of sugar.


RANKING from best to worst:


Salsa (19 points)
Balsamic vinegar / Soy sauce / Dijon mustard (15 points)
Sour cream (12 points)
Gravy (11 points)
Ketchup (10 points)
Chutney (5 points)
Olive oil (0 points)
Mayonnaise (0 points)
Honey mustard (-4 points)
Sweet chili sauce (-5 points)
Hollandaise sauce / French salad dressing (-15 points)

Remember that many of these are subjective to the brand, but it is still a useful guide.
For example, french salad dressing (ranked worst) can provide a similar taste to balsamic vinegar, so if it is the taste you are after, go with the balsamic vinegar (ranked 2nd). Olive oil may be harshly done by receiving 0 points although it is in fact a healthy option. It is high in unsaturated (good) fats and has many health benefits. It's hard therefore to provide a concrete system of ranking condiments, but it is still a definite eye-opener. 

An article written by Allie Firestone on http://www.divinecaroline.com/22177/92814-hold-ketchup-high-calorie-condiments-add highlights how condiments can add hundreds of calories a day to your food diary:

Breakfast
  • 1 tablespoon butter: 102 calories. And who stops at a tablespoon?
  • 1 tablespoon seedless strawberry jam: 50 calories.
  • 2 tablespoons peanut butter: 188 calories. Healthy, but very high-cal.
  • 1/4 cup hollandaise sauce: 62 calories; eggs Benedict includes easily this much.

Registered dietician, Keri Glassman in another article goes on to show how these can easily clock up: 

BREAKFAST
Eggs
3 tbsp. ketchup - 48 calories
Toast
2 tsp. butter - 70 calories

LUNCH
Grilled barbecue chicken sandwich -
2 tbsp. barbecue Sauce - 50 calories

DINNER
Teriyaki steak -
1/4 cup teriyaki sauce - 60 calories
Baked Potato
2 tbsp. sour cream and 2 tsp. butter - 120 calories 


Condiments alone have totaled a whopping 348 calories - 17.4% of a 2000 calorie limit on condiments alone! 

Of course it would not be practical to completely rule condiments out of daily eating habits, however it is important to be mindful of healthier and better alternatives.

As the definition already states, condiments provide a particular flavour or enhance the flavour of the meal. According to Ayurveda, there are 6 tastes and combining all 6 into meals prevents cravings. Cravings are, in essence, the result of feeling like something is "missing" and a need to fulfill that desire. 

These 6 tastes are:
Sweet, salty, sour, bitter, pungent and astringent.
The last two, pungent and astringent, may seem unknown to Westerners, so I shall briefly explain.
Pungent is the hottest of the tastes and this taste can be acquired in foods like radishes, garlic, onions, black pepper, ginger, cayenne and mustard. 
Astringent is the least common of the 6 tastes and also the most difficult taste to describe. It can create one of 2 feelings. A "puckering or dry" taste similar to that caused by tannins in red wine and fruits like cranberries, or a "dry chalky" feeling caused by many beans, lentils and chickpeas. It can also be detected in tumeric, marjoram and some wholegrains like rye and buckwheat. 

Attaining these tastes from herbs and spices also provide the healthy benefits not found in the more commonly used condiments. For one, herbs and spices provide almost 0 calories, fat, saturated fat, sodium and sugar, yet are bursting with flavours and aromas. 

For example, Keri Glassman addresses this in the above example where condiments contributed an astounding 348 calories:
Instead of using 3 tablespoons of tartar sauce for a shrimp cocktail (120 calories), using alternatives like lemon juice and garlic (almost 0 calories) is a far better, healthier and still very tasty alternative!

When I cook mince, I don't need to use calorie laden mince sauces, I simply use herbs and spices and it tastes refreshing and amazing! Try this:
Chop 2 onions and 4 cloves of garlic and cook until soft. Add 500g lean mince, some chopped carrots, peas and tomato and cook for 25 or so minutes. While cooking add 1 teaspoon salt and black pepper. Add herbs like origanum, thyme and rosemary. Put the lid on while cooking so the natural juices are sealed in. So simple and so tasty and minus all the calories from sauce AND very importantly, minus all the horrible added chemicals and preservatives so often found in condiments. Serve with brown rice and a salad (lettuce, tomato, carrots, celery, green pepper, cucumber).

This leads me to the question: Are we just dunking more and more condiments on our foods because we actually don't know how to make them taste better?

Perhaps we are just bored with our hum-drum meals? If you want to create a more interesting salad, try some of my favourite options:

1) Pear/strawberry/apple, pecan nut and blue cheese salad
Deliciously fresh and so simple. Place a whole lot of lettuce and whatever leaves you want in a salad bowl. Slice up some apple or pear or strawberries (anything sweet) and place on the top. Sprinkle some pecan nuts in the salad. Grate and add shavings of blue cheese on top. The intense savoury flavour of the soft blue cheese, with the sweetness of the fruit, combined with the crunchy wholeness of the nuts = one amazing salad that will impress everyone!

                                          http://lovemarriagerepulican.blogspot.com/2011/04/easter-brunch-menu.html


2) 3 bean salad 
So healthy, great for summer days and high-protein meal for vegetarians.
1 can cannellini beans
1 can kidney beans
1 can butter beans
2 stalks of celery
Half an onion (or red onion)
Chopped up parsley (optional)

Drain and rinse the beans. Mix in a large bowl. Chop the onions, celery and parsley, and mix into the beans.

Separately, whisk 1/3 cup cider vinegar with 1/4 cup olive oil and 2 tablespoons of sugar. Mix in some salt (1-1.5 teaspoons) and pepper.
Once whisked, add this to the bean mix and allow to settle in the fridge. YUMMO! This is a must-try, I love this one. .



3) Carrot and raisin salad
For those days when you don't have lettuce and wanting a sweet and juicy salad!
Grate some carrots and add in some raisins. Add a little orange juice/mango juice. Done. Simple and juicy!



Find me on Facebook! Join my page Nutrition through Science or Fitnessfacts100

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

In the Press

As some of you may know, I have been awarded a grant from the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) in Belgium to present my research at the 21st World Diabetes Congress to be held in Dubai (UAE) in December. I am so privileged to be 1 of 100 in the world to receive this grant that covers my travel, accommodation and registration to present my research. The session I will be presenting in is entitled:
"Modeling Diabetes and Obesity Through Animals" and will be presenting research along side people from Germany, China, Algeria and Australia.

I know I will benefit greatly from this conference and it is a wonderful learning opportunity for me. A great thank you to everyone who has helped me achieve this.
Join me on facebook on my page Nutrition through Science or Fitnessfacts100

Monday, September 19, 2011

06 Muffins are code name for cake

I wonder how many people actually realise this: that muffins are just code name for cake?




            VS.




Have you ever realised that to make muffins and cake, you use the same ingredients? You basically pour cake batter into a muffin mould, change the name and voila! We believe by some twisted logic, that muffins are in fact, better for us than cake. Even more astonishing is that it has become quite the trend to have a cup of coffee and a muffin as a substitute for a healthy breakfast. Yet, would you really eat a piece of cake for breakfast??

For my experiment to see exactly what the difference is (if any), I googled: "Chocolate cake recipe", and "Chocolate muffin recipe",. I randomly selected 2 recipes each.

Then, I added all the ingredients into a calorie analyser. After putting in all the ingredients, the software calculates the total calorie content, and then you select how many servings this makes. So, if it makes 12, it divides the total calorie number by 12, including all the other parameters like carbohydrates, protein, fat, saturated fat, sugar, and fibre. I then standardized this so that each serving size is per 100g.
The results are amazing!

Common ingredients for cake and muffins:
Sugar
Butter/Oil
Flour
Raising agent
Egg

The ratios vary slightly, but not much. The only difference is you may make 12 muffins or 1 cake that gives 8-12 slices. In fact I often use cake recipes for muffins. But here are the results anyway:










The first recipe used chocolate chips as opposed to cocoa. If you compare the means (the average) we get:
Assuming no icing on either:
Average chocolate muffin: 393 calories
Average chocolate cake: 334 calories

I wonder if it is psychological that we do not associate the same meaning of "muffin" with "cake"? I know I don't. If everytime you had to order a muffin, and call it "cake", do you think you would think twice before eating it? I think yes. I know I would. Wikipedia (yes we know especially in science is not the most reliable source), but nonetheless, defines "muffins" as an American-English term that are "somewhat like small cakes or cupcakes in shape". Aha. Cupcake. Cake. Mmm. Even still, I don't think we make the same association of "cupcake" with "cake". 

The term "muffin-top" refers to the "spilling over" jeans syndrome that seems to be spreading world wide:








           = 



Besides the fact that muffins look totally desirable and topple over the sides of the case does not mean that we should replicate this or consider this desirable. As the saying goes, you are what you eat - too many muffins and you may start looking like one!
Personally I don't think anyone should ever be eating muffins for breakfast - not even so called health muffins. Yes, they may substitute all purpose flour for wholewheat flour and contain some nuts and fruit, but the chances are, they still aren't very healthy for you and full of sugar. If you wouldn't eat cake as a snack, don't eat muffins as a snack.

I think our society has lost touch on what a "treat" is and reward ourselves for things that really aren't "reward-worthy". Just because you went to gym does not mean that should be considered "reward-worthy". That should be considered "part of daily life". I truly believe when you really appreciate things as "reward/special", you will really treasure eating that delicacy. I remember growing up, my mother never ever kept sweets, chocolate, crisps or biscuits in the house - that was a real treat. One vivid memory I have is being 4 years old and receiving 2 squares of chocolate and thinking it was like Christmas! Such a treat, and remember being told to "Enjoy it, and eat it slowly." Nowadays, we could eat 2 squares of chocolate and not even remember putting it in our mouths! Mindless eating is a global pandemic that needs to be stopped. 
The art, pleasure and beauty of eating needs to be rekindled and rediscovered. Culture needs to be reignited and celebrated. Has greed really grown to the point where we can eat 2 muffins as a "by-the-by" part of our day and not think of it as a pure bliss? 

Personally, I think we need to all throw out the sweets, biscuits, chocolate, chips, fizzy drinks, breakfast bars, chocolatey cereals etc. from our cupboards. If we placed more emphasis on baking sweet goods:
a) The effort involved would likely reduce the amount of times desired to make them.
b) It is always so much more pleasing to eat something self created. Appreciation to eating is KEY.

Bottom line:
More than changing our eating habits, we need to change our state of mind...

Find me on facebook - join my page Nutrition through Science or Fitnessfacts100

Thursday, September 1, 2011

05 The bread stigma - its not the bread that's making you fat ...then what is?


Bread. That's one of the first things we hear people who go on diet say they are giving up.
It seems to be ingrained in our brains that bread = carbs = BAD = gain weight = FAT.
Yes, even I have believed this. When I was 15, I was training for the Junior World Championships in Acrobatics - I didn't eat bread for a year! I substituted eating sandwiches for lunch with yoghurt and protein shakes.

What I find amazing is some people's refusal to eat bread - yet if they saw it scientifically, they would think twice about their food options! Granted, I do not eat white bread - a) it is not healthy because it is made of refined carbohydrates and offers little fibre and b) I find it gives me bad stomach cramps and I feel bloated. What I am talking about though, is brown bread. The specific brand of bread I eat is "low GI brown seeded bread" by Albany. South Africans will know this is the Albany bread with the yellow trim.

In this very short review I want to compare it to something people seem to consume by the gallon without batting an eyelid of the consequences and - even worse - actually believe it is healthy for them. Just what am I referring to - fruit juice.




Compare 1 slice brown bread to 1 glass orange juice
By plugging in the nutritional values on the label of brown bread and orange juice we get the following images:

Is it surprising that a slice of bread has fewer calories than orange juice? What is almost amusing is the fact that people avoid bread because it contains carbs - yet it has only 58% of the carbs of a single glass of orange juice! But you will most surely find many dieters opting for a glass of orange juice over bread under the pretense that it is healthy and full of vitamins and minerals. 1 slice of brown bread contains almost 3 times the amount of protein compared to orange juice which is great when you need to ensure you get adequate protein in your diet to maintain muscle and lose fat. Brown bread has almost 6 times the amount of fibre compared to a glass of orange juice.

Fibre has long been associated to aid in weight loss. Fibre is a bulky food that is more difficult to digest than carbohydrates, promoting the feeling of "being full and satisfied" and prolonging the retention of gastric contents. Gastric retention slows down the rate at which nutrients are absorbed, meaning if the nutrients are absorbed slower, you will not feel hungry again as quickly. Consumption of fibre promotes the production of saliva as well as gastric acids and enhances the desire for water, which further serves to enhance satiety and feelings of fullness. Research has shown that patients who add 14g of fibre to their diet will reduce their calorie consumption by 10%.

The effects of sugar can never be downplayed. 1 glass of orange juice contains 21g of sugar, whereas brown bread has 1/10 of that at only 2.2g of sugar. To put this into perspective for you:
4g sugar = 1 teaspoon

1 glass orange juice = 5 teaspoons of sugar
1 slice brown bread = 0.5 teaspoons of sugar

When you're on a diet, you certainly aren't going to eat 5 teaspoons of sugar in one go so why drink a glass of fruit juice as opposed to eating bread? Really doesn't make sense huh?
Also remember my previous article (http://nutritionalbiochem.blogspot.com/2011/08/03-saving-calories-why-this-doesnt-work.html) - the more sugar dumped into your system, the more insulin is secreted to compensate. At high concentrations, insulin activates the enzyme citrate lyase that turns off energy metabolism, and switches on fat generating pathways.

Remember also, your sugar allowance is only 10% of your total calorie consumption. Remembering from my 2nd article (http://nutritionalbiochem.blogspot.com/2011/07/02-its-all-about-label.html), 1g carbohydrate = 4 calories, then 21g sugar = 84 calories.
If you have a 2000 calorie limit, 84 calories of 2000 is 4.2% of 10% limit - so you've almost had half your sugar limit for the ENTIRE day. Doesn't leave you with much room to eat any other carbohydrates, or, more likely, the chances of you exceeding your sugar allowance for the day are almost guaranteed.

Finally, 1 measly glass of fruit juice isn't going to take you far - it won't be long at all, perhaps even minutes before you start feeling hungry again. Eating a slice of bread is far more substantial and far more nutritious - and actually, far better for your diet.
I could go on and on about the negative effects of fruit juice - don't even get me started on fructose (my entire masters thesis!)

What I'm trying to make you aware of, is that the culprit for sabotaging your diet could be a sneaky thing! Many many MANY people will think they are having a healthy boost start to their morning by having a deliciously cold fresh glass of orange juice - oh how innocent-sounding! Poor bread gets all the blame. Bad bread bad! Orange juice is just smiling and laughing...and making you fat.

If I can give any advise, seriously limit your intake of fruit juices. Many people do not realise to make 1 glass of fruit juice requires at least 3-4 pieces of fruit, when realistically, you would never sit and eat 4 oranges in 1 go. If you're on a diet, drink water.
If you really want fruit juice, either, dilute it with water (half glass fruit juice+half glass water) or do what I do: Just drink half a glass or less - on the odd occasion. You will notice many fruit juice labels state per 100ml. That's about 1/3 of a glass.
Its not always about cutting out, its all about moderation.


I decided to add this after publishing: Just so you don't think its orange juice that is worse than bread but all fruit juice, I am adding in the nutritional labels from other juices below:






Find me on Facebook - Join my page Nutrition through Science or Fitnessfacts100

Friday, August 26, 2011

04 Think, understand and apply - Muscle does NOT weigh more than fat

My supervisor has a phrase he likes to use on a regular basis - If you don't think, you will never learn anything. My high school had a similar motto, that being - Think, Understand and Apply. I am here to help you - to show you, to educate you. Please do not just hear something, believe it, and never question it. WHY and HOW are the most important questions we can ask in life. For many of you, let's be honest - you will categorically state:
MUSCLE WEIGHS MORE THAN FAT.
Really? Have you ever asked yourself : Why? Why do I believe this? Have I even thought about this statement?
Lets be scientific.

From the beautiful image above (all credit thanks to http://www.onemorebite-weightloss.com/muscle-to-fat.html), you can now see, you cannot say, 5kg of muscle weighs more than 5kg of fat. They both weigh 5kg. 
What we CAN say, is muscle takes up less SPACE or scientifically said, muscle is more DENSE than fat.
Kilogram for kilogram fat takes up more volume. This means, if you have two women and they both weigh the same, they can look vastly different.
Assuming the same height, a woman weighing 60kg with 18% body fat will look a lot smaller than a woman weighing 60kg with 30% body fat.
I found a site that is trying to help show people how your perception can be so misguided. It is a site that uploads photographs (sent in by volunteers) giving examples of what people look like at a certain height and weight, and you can see many examples of what I have explained above.
http://www.cockeyed.com/photos/bodies/heightweight.html

The next thing I would like to explain is, when you start training, I repeatedly hear despondent people saying:
                                              THE SCALE KEEPS GOING UP!! :((((
The next thing I hear, is a friend or someone trying to console them saying:
                                                          image taken from (http://hyperboleandahalf.blogspot.com/2010/09/party.html)
                                              But muscle weighs more than fat! :D

Right, so. Let's get it straight. The scale is going up because you are BUILDING muscle. But! Beware
DID YOU CHECK YOUR MEASUREMENTS?
If the scale is going up, and your measurements are going up, this means, you have not lost any fat.
Your total volume is going up.
If your weight is going up or staying the same (in this latter case, assuming you gain 1kg muscle and lose 1kg fat), and your measurements are coming down - YAY! This means, you are gaining muscle and losing fat. The muscle takes up less space (losing cm or inches from your body)

Obviously the easiest way is to go and get your body fat percentage checked and monitored, however this costs money. What do I do personally? I maintain my weight within 1kg, I train and eat carefully, and my measurements are dropping (slowly). My muscle mass is increasing and my fat percentage is decreasing. I can see this, my muscles are becoming more defined and lean. This way, I am not trying to lose weight (and risk the chance of losing muscle). This will take a while to get right, because it is easier to gain muscle than to lose fat. Losing fat is the body's last option. It will rather burn muscle first than fat. This is where your diet and exercise comes in. You need to make sure you train right and eat right to ensure you lose fat and not muscle.
If you starve yourself, the first source you will lose is muscle and most likely replace the muscle with fat. Inevitably, you are making yourself look fatter. If you overeat, you will gain fat. You need to make sure you EAT and you eat right.

To share a personal story, in 2007, I used to (wrongly) think that my "ideal weight" was 52kg. With my height at 173cm, this placed my BMI at 17.39 (underweight). I remember thinking that my friend who weighed the same, and was the same height was so much skinnier than me! The other thing I remember is that I could not run as fast or jump as high as I used to. I often felt tired and blegh - no muscle tone. I was a skinny fat person! What I believed then was that if my weight was less, I would be smaller. What I know NOW, is that if I train and eat right and gain muscle and lose fat, I will be smaller. I am a good 3kg heavier now than I was then, but my measurements are smaller than I was then. At 52kg I wore size 34 jeans (size 10), now at 55kg, I wear size 32 (size 8) jeans. True story folks.

What you really need to think about is not an ideal weight, but an ideal body composition. High muscle mass, less body fat, and from that small measurements will follow. And then we will all look fabulous and feel fantastic! :)

Find me on Facebook - Join my group Nutrition through Science or Fitnessfacts100